10th Indian Delegation to Dubai, Gitex & Expand North Star – World’s Largest Startup Investor Connect
Mobility

Tesla wins Autopilot crash case in California, Jury finds no negligence

Tesla has won a legal victory after a California jury found the automaker was not to blame for a 2019 crash involving its Autopilot advanced driver assistance system.

The plaintiff, Los Angeles resident Justine Hsu, had sued Tesla last year, alleging negligence, fraud and breach of contract, after her Tesla Model S hit a median on a city street while Autopilot was engaged. The airbags deployed, fracturing Hsu’s jaw and causing nerve damage. Hsu was seeking damages from Tesla, but the jury awarded no damages in the case.

This appears to be the first case involving Autopilot to go to trial. The court found that Tesla was not to blame for the crash and that the airbag deployed as it should have. Furthermore, the court noted that Tesla had properly warned users not to use the system while driving on city streets, which Hsu did.

The verdict is a win for Tesla as it faces increased regulatory scrutiny over Autopilot, as well as the enhanced versions of the system called Enhanced Autopilot and Full Self-Driving (FSD) software. Tesla vehicles come with a driver assistance system called Autopilot as standard, and for a $6,000 upgrade, owners can purchase Enhanced Autopilot with several other features.

For an additional $15,000, owners can buy FSD, which CEO Elon Musk has promised will one day deliver full autonomous driving capabilities. However, Tesla vehicles are not yet self-driving, and FSD still requires the driver to be ready to take control at all times. The FSD feature includes several automated driving features such as Summon and Navigate on Autopilot.

The latter is an active guidance system that can navigate a car from a highway on-ramp to off-ramp, including interchanges and making lane changes. It is also supposed to handle steering on city streets and recognize and react to traffic lights and stop signs.

In February, Tesla paused the rollout of its Full Self-Driving beta software in the United States and Canada following a recall of the system that federal safety regulators warned could allow vehicles to act unsafely around intersections and cause crashes.

by INC42

SUMMARY Ola Electric said that its 4680 Bharat Cell is based on the “most advanced” dry electrode technology in a cylindrical form factor, and surpasses the pouch cell technology mentioned in the reports A South Korean publication recently claimed that an unnamed former LG Energy Solution executive attempted to pass on the IPs to Ola Electric to create “Bharat cell” The statement by the homegrown EV manufacterer added that “the fear of losing market opportunities, including a significant customer in Ola Electric, is prompting the… Source link

by INC42

SUMMARY Ola Electric now intends to scale its capacity to 20 GWh by the second half of 2027 on the back of its new hero product – battery energy storage system While the “EV + energy” combo has potential in the long term, the EV maker would need to make investments and market the new product, further putting strain on its bottom line Ola Electric’s early years were about growth and EVs, but the tanking stock price has made it turn its focus to addressing quality issues and foraying into new segments to turn… Source link

by INC42

SUMMARY Euler Motors managed to cut losses on the back of its growing top line which grew 12% to INR 191.3 Cr in FY25 from INR 170.8 Cr in the previous fiscal year The startup’s core revenue channel, sales of vehicles remained strong for the year under review contributing to about 90% of the total operating revenue at INR 173.1 Cr in FY25, up 22% from INR 142 Cr in the previous year Founded in 2018 by Saurav Kumar, Euler Motors manufacturers E3W and E4W, catering to the logistics sector of the country EV manufacturer Euler… Source link