10th Indian Delegation to Dubai, Gitex & Expand North Star – World’s Largest Startup Investor Connect
Artificial Intelligence

How Sierra is rethinking customer experience in the age of AI


We’ve been hearing about the notion of customer experience forever, the idea that we could improve customer interactions with brands digitally. So far, the results have been mixed at best.

Sierra, the new startup from Bret Taylor and Clay Bavor, thinks that AI agents could be the next technology frontier, not unlike websites or mobile apps that came before them: essential digital assets for every company, and ones that could ultimately deliver on the promise of digital customer experience.

Whether or not that’s true, the two founders fundamentally see AI agents as a new technology category, providing an entirely new way for customers to interact with brands to improve their overall experience.

“Our thesis is really simple. We think that conversational AI will become the dominant form factor that people use to interact with brands, not just for the sort of current trends like customer service, but really for all aspects of the customer experience,” Taylor told TechCrunch.

What that means is that customers can enter free-form questions and requests into a search-style box, and the AI agent should be able to understand that request and take action by connecting to whatever transactional systems are required. That can be tasks like looking up an order in an order management system or rescheduling a delivery in a scheduling system, as a couple of examples.

Taylor and Bavor acknowledge that it’s not always easy to connect to these systems, especially if they’re older. But most of the CIOs they’ve talked to have indicated that they’ve built APIs that connect to these older systems, making it much easier for Sierra to communicate with them.

Regardless, Taylor and Bavor recognize that there are some serious challenges and risks when it comes to humans interacting with these AI agents. “When you put an AI in front of customers, the value is a lot higher obviously, but the risks are a lot higher, too, with brand misrepresentation and hallucination — all the technical problems that are candidly the hardest problems in AI,” Taylor said.

These are not minor issues, particularly the hallucination problem, where large language models sometimes make up things when they don’t know how to answer a prompt. That could be potentially devastating to a brand’s reputation, depending on the nature of the answer.

While no company has solved hallucinations yet — and potentially never will — Sierra is working to mitigate the problem (but then, isn’t everyone?). The company’s software is based on the idea of autonomous agents. “What that means in practice is that there’s not a single model producing a response from a Sierra agent.” In fact, Taylor says, it sometimes involves as many as seven models, including one they have dubbed “the supervisor” that monitors answer quality, and if it deems the answer questionable, it sends it back for reevaluation. Taylor acknowledges that handling hallucinations is an ongoing research problem for the industry.

As though that weren’t enough to worry about, when it comes to handling customer data in an automated fashion, there are a whole host of regulatory and data privacy issues to deal with. But Taylor and Bavor say that their agents are designed to handle that as well.

Taylor believes that AI is fundamentally different from software as we’ve known it over the last 30 years, and it requires an educational component to help customers understand the power and the pitfalls. “So part of our go-to-market motion is both mitigating these risks [and] teaching our customers about how this new type of software works,” he said.

But the flip side of that risk is that it represents a huge opportunity for the company. “Anytime there is a sea change in technology, it opens a window of opportunity for smaller companies to explore that open space and really take some risks and try some new things,” Bavor said.

This new wave of AI will generate at least five to 10 meaningfully new independent enterprise software companies, Taylor said, not unlike when cloud and mobile came along. “There’s an opportunity for a new technology model. There’s no market leader in conversational AI right now because it’s new. It’s a year old, if that, and so, everyone’s figuring this out in real time,” he said.

Taylor, who is also board chair at OpenAI, doesn’t see the two companies competing or any conflict between the two, although one could certainly argue that they do. “We don’t see OpenAI as competitive, and I will obviously recuse myself if there is ever a potential conflict,” he said.

The founders also think a new platform should have a new approach to pricing, and they have designed an entirely new pricing model based on outcomes. Instead of tiered subscription fees or usage-based pricing we’ve seen with other software companies, they want customers to pay only for outcomes, when a problem is resolved.

“We think outcome-based pricing is the future of software. I think with AI we finally have technology that isn’t just making us more productive but actually doing the job. It’s actually finishing the job,” Taylor said. And that’s the point where they intend to charge the customer. The mechanics, however, are still being worked out with early customers.

For all that, and even factoring in the experience of the two founders, Brent Leary, founder and principal analyst at CRM Essentials, thinks the usual incumbents like Taylor’s former company, Salesforce, are going to be difficult to compete with.

“I mean [Taylor] is incredibly intelligent and capable, there’s no doubting that,” Leary said. “But with Salesforce there’s a lot of institutional experience and skills and other resources that a startup doesn’t have, even if it’s headed by someone like Bret. And these huge companies are throwing all of their R&D investments and restructuring their whole operations already around the opportunities they’re seeing with AI.”

To be clear, Sierra is well capitalized, although certainly not at the level of a company like Salesforce. The pedigree of Taylor and Bavor combined with the potential market they are going after is attracting big investment with the company scoring $110 million already with $25 million from Benchmark, and an additional $85 million from Sequoia. That is an extraordinary amount of money for an early-stage company — but these are not your typical founders.

Sequoia Capital partner Ravi Gupta, who is leading his firm’s investment in Sierra, says beyond the background of the two founders, the firm was impressed by the technology and its potential. “I think seeing it in action is the thing that was remarkable, and I think it really captured our imagination of what future customer interactions can be,” he said, adding that it wasn’t a hard decision for him to write a check.

Sierra clearly sees a big opportunity to transform customer experience with AI, but many obstacles stand in the way of success. If the founders can find a way to adequately address the pitfalls of free-form, AI-driven, automated customer service agents, while staving off established enterprise competitors, it could be a successful startup, but like everything else involving AI, it still has to prove that it can do that — and do it consistently and at scale.



Source link

by Team SNFYI

Facebook is testing a new feature that invites some users—mainly in the US and Canada—to let Meta AI access parts of their phone’s camera roll. This opt-in “cloud processing” option uploads recent photos and videos to Meta’s servers so the AI can offer personalized suggestions, such as creating collages, highlight reels, or themed memories like birthdays and graduations. It can also generate AI-based edits or restyles of those images. Meta says this is optional and assures users that the uploaded media won’t be used for advertising. However, to enable this, people must agree to let Meta analyze faces, objects, and metadata like time and location. Currently, the company claims these photos won’t be used to train its AI models—but they haven’t completely ruled that out for the future. Typically, only the last 30 days of photos get uploaded, though special or older images might stay on Meta’s servers longer for specific features. Users have the option to disable the feature anytime, which prompts Meta to delete the stored media after 30 days. Privacy experts are concerned that this expands Meta’s reach into private, unpublished images and could eventually feed future AI training. Unlike Google Photos, which explicitly states that user photos won’t train its AI, Meta hasn’t made that commitment yet. For now, this is still a test run for a limited group of people, but it highlights the tension between AI-powered personalization and the need to protect personal data.

by Team SNFYI

News Update Bymridul     |    March 14, 2024 Meesho, an online shopping platform based in Bengaluru, has announced its largest Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP) buyback pool to date, totaling Rs 200 crore. This buyback initiative extends to both current and former employees, providing wealth creation opportunities for approximately 1,700 individuals. Ashish Kumar Singh, Meesho’s Chief Human Resources Officer, emphasized the company’s commitment to rewarding its teams, stating, “At Meesho, our employees are the driving force behind our success.” Singh further highlighted the company’s dedication to providing opportunities for wealth creation despite prevailing macroeconomic conditions. This marks the fourth wealth generation opportunity at Meesho, with the size of the buyback program increasing each year. In previous years, Meesho conducted buybacks worth over Rs 8.2 crore in February 2020, Rs 41.4 crore in November 2020, and Rs 45.5 crore in October 2021. Meesho’s profitability journey began in July 2023, making it the first horizontal Indian e-commerce company to achieve profitability. Despite turning profitable, Meesho continues to maintain positive cash flow and focuses on enhancing efficiencies across various cost items. The company’s revenue from operations for FY 2022-23 witnessed a remarkable growth of 77% over the previous year, amounting to Rs 5,735 crore. This growth can be attributed to Meesho’s leadership position as the most downloaded shopping app in India in both 2022 and 2023, increased transaction frequency among existing customers, and a diversified category mix. Additionally, Meesho’s focus on improving monetization through value-added seller services contributed to its revenue growth. Meesho also disclosed its audited performance for the first half of FY 2023-24, reporting consolidated revenues from operations of Rs 3,521 crore, marking a 37% year-over-year increase. The company achieved profitability in Q2 FY24, with a significant reduction in losses compared to the previous year. Furthermore, Meesho recorded impressive app download numbers, reaching 145 million downloads in India in 2023 and surpassing 500 million downloads in H1 FY 2023-24. Follow Startup Story Source link

by Team SNFYI

You might’ve heard of Grok, X’s answer to OpenAI’s ChatGPT. It’s a chatbot, and, in that sense, behaves as as you’d expect — answering questions about current events, pop culture and so on. But unlike other chatbots, Grok has “a bit of wit,” as X owner Elon Musk puts it, and “a rebellious streak.” Long story short, Grok is willing to speak to topics that are usually off limits to other chatbots, like polarizing political theories and conspiracies. And it’ll use less-than-polite language while doing so — for example, responding to the question “When is it appropriate to listen to Christmas music?” with “Whenever the hell you want.” But Grok’s ostensible biggest selling point is its ability to access real-time X data — an ability no other chatbots have, thanks to X’s decision to gatekeep that data. Ask it “What’s happening in AI today?” and Grok will piece together a response from very recent headlines, while ChatGPT, by contrast, will provide only vague answers that reflect the limits of its training data (and filters on its web access). Earlier this week, Musk pledged that he would open source Grok, without revealing precisely what that meant. So, you’re probably wondering: How does Grok work? What can it do? And how can I access it? You’ve come to the right place. We’ve put together this handy guide to help explain all things Grok. We’ll keep it up to date as Grok changes and evolves. How does Grok work? Grok is the invention of xAI, Elon Musk’s AI startup — a startup reportedly in the process of raising billions in venture capital. (Developing AI’s expensive.) Underpinning Grok is a generative AI model called Grok-1, developed over the course of months on a cluster of “tens of thousands” of GPUs (according to an xAI blog post). To train it, xAI sourced data both from the web (dated up to Q3 2023) and feedback from human assistants that xAI refers to as “AI tutors.” On popular benchmarks, Grok-1 is about as capable as Meta’s open source Llama 2 chatbot model and surpasses OpenAI’s GPT-3.5, xAI claims. Image Credits: xAI Human-guided feedback, or reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF), is the way most AI-powered chatbots are fine-tuned these days. RLHF involves training a generative model, then gathering additional information to train a “reward” model and fine-tuning the generative model with the reward model via reinforcement learning. RLHF is quite good at “teaching” models to follow instructions — but not perfect. Like other models, Grok is prone to hallucinating, sometimes offering misinformation and false timelines when asked about news. And these can be severe — like wrongly claiming that the Israel–Palestine conflict reached a ceasefire when it hadn’t. For questions that stretch beyond its knowledge base, Grok leverages “real-time access” to info on X (and from Tesla, according to Bloomberg). And, similar to ChatGPT, the model has internet browsing capabilities, enabling it to search the web for up-to-date information about topics. Musk has promised improvements with the …