10th Indian Delegation to Dubai, Gitex & Expand North Star – World’s Largest Startup Investor Connect
LegalTech

Ghazal Alagh’s The Derma Co Wins Against Lakme; Court Orders Ad Modifications

Honasa Consumer Ltd (HCL), the parent company of MamaEarth, and Hindustan Unilever Ltd (HUL), which owns Lakme, have filed defamation lawsuits against each other. The dispute led to a Delhi High Court hearing, where the court ordered HUL to withdraw its recent Lakme ads.

The conflict stems from Lakme’s new sunscreen campaign titled “SPF Lie Detector Test,” which HCL claims unfairly targets rival products—particularly one that resembles a sunscreen from its brand, The Derma Co. HCL argued that the campaign is misleading and damaging, prompting it to take legal action in the Delhi High Court. In response, HUL filed its own case against Honasa in the Bombay High Court.

The issue gained further attention after HCL co-founder Ghazal Alagh posted on LinkedIn, criticizing long-standing complacency in the FMCG industry and indirectly referring to Lakme’s ad. The campaign suggests that some bestselling online sunscreens claiming SPF 50 actually offer far less protection—closer to SPF 20—based on in-vivo testing (a testing method conducted on living organisms).

Although HUL did not name any competitors in its ad, it visually compared generic yellow bottles to Lakme’s packaging and highlighted its decade-long use of in-vivo SPF testing to substantiate its claims.

The Indian sunscreen market, valued at approximately USD 832.32 million, is rapidly expanding, with an expected annual growth rate of 6% through 2030. Major players in the market include HUL, Honasa, Nykaa, and L’Oréal, reflecting the growing demand for sun protection products in India’s hot and humid climate.

by Team SNFYI

In partnership with Trilegal and The Centre for Technology, Entertainment and Sports Law, NUJS, Kolkata Coinswitch, India’s largest crypto trading platform, today announced the launch of ‘Block by Block’, a national-level paper presentation competition focused on Virtual Digital Assets (VDAs). The initiative, launched in partnership with India’s leading law firm Trilegal, and The Centre for Technology, Entertainment and Sports Law at NUJS Kolkata, aims to engage law and public policy students in shaping India’s future regulatory landscape for VDAs. The competition challenges students to develop innovative, practical policy proposals on the regulation of VDAs in India. Participants are invited to submit papers on the theme: “A Policy Approach for Regulation of Virtual Digital Assets/Crypto assets to Foster the Growth of a New Asset Class in India.” “At CoinSwitch, we believe that responsible innovation requires collaboration between industry, academia, and policymakers. ‘Block by Block’ is our effort to create a platform where the next generation of legal and policy minds can contribute meaningfully to India’s growing ecosystem. As Web3 continues to evolve, it’s crucial that we build the ecosystem thoughtfully and we believe students have a big role to play in that journey,” said Ashish Singhal, Co-founder, CoinSwitch. The competition provides a rare opportunity for students to work on real-world policy challenges in collaboration with leading industry and legal experts. Unlike most academic competitions, ‘Block by Block’ is backed by active industry participation offering both credibility and visibility to participants. Some of the key highlights are as follows:  Key highlights:  “As a centre committed to the study of law and emerging technologies, we’re proud to collaborate on ‘Block by Block’ a platform that gives students the chance to work on real-world challenges related to digital asset regulation. Initiatives like this not only promote academic rigour but also prepare our students to become active contributors to the future of tech policy in India,” added Dr. Shameek Sen, Professor, The Centre for Technology, Entertainment and Sports Law at NUJS Kolkata. “We believe in contributing to the development of progressive legal thought-leadership on emerging technologies including digital assets. We are excited to partner with CoinSwitch for this initiative that encourages future lawyers and policymakers to engage and help shape the legal discourse around this evolving asset class,” said Jaideep Reddy, Partner, Trilegal. The competition officially launches on July 25, 2025, with entries open for 6 weeks until September 10, 2025. Submissions, limited to a maximum of 5,000 words (excluding footnotes), will be evaluated on key parameters including originality and novelty, research and evidence, analytical rigor, clarity of structure, and adherence to formatting guidelines. The competition also allows for co-authorship, with up to two individuals permitted per entry. About CoinSwitch Founded in 2017, CoinSwitch is India’s largest crypto trading platform and a pioneer in shaping the country’s crypto ecosystem. With over 2 crore users, CoinSwitch operates a regulatory-compliant platform that simplifies and enhances crypto trading for both retail and professional investors.  Backed by global investors such as Coinbase Ventures, Tiger Global, and Sequoia Capital India …

by Team SNFYI

During a Karnataka High Court session on July 1, 2025, a lawyer representing X (formerly Twitter) referred to government officials as “Tom, Dick, and Harry” while criticizing the broad powers granted to them under Indian law to issue content removal orders. This remark came up during a dispute over a video that the Ministry of Railways wanted to be removed, showing a woman driving a car on a railway track in Hyderabad. The lawyer argued that such powers could be misused, potentially undermining due process. Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, representing the government, objected strongly to the language used, defending the legal authority of government officials. The presiding judge, Justice M. Nagaprasanna, also criticized the comment, reaffirming the respect due to government officials. The case centers on X’s challenge to a government-run website that it claims acts as a “censorship portal,” arguing that it enables multiple officials to issue content removal orders without proper legal safeguards. The Indian government counters that the website merely serves as a notification tool to ensure compliance, not to enable content censorship. The Karnataka High Court has set a final hearing for July 8, 2025, and allowed X Corp to amend its petition to include several Union ministries. The Union of India has been instructed to file a response before the next hearing. This legal conflict is part of the growing tension between X and the Indian government regarding content moderation and censorship practices, a dispute that has been intensifying since 2021.

by Team SNFYI

LegalWiki, India’s growing platform for legal knowledge and community engagement, concluded its first-ever Legal Startup Pitching Competition with overwhelming success. Held over two days on 21st and 22nd June, the event brought together aspiring legal entrepreneurs, seasoned professionals, and industry experts in a high-energy, solution-focused forum aimed at reimagining the future of legal services in India. The competition saw participation from 25+ teams of law students, professionals, and innovators, each pitching startup ideas tailored to improve access, efficiency, and innovation in legal services. The entries were judged by an esteemed panel comprising Tanuj Kalia, founder of Lawctopus, Rahul Bagga, Partner, Dentons Link Legal, Ms Priyanka, COO of Manupatra, Angsuman Ray, CTO of MikeLegal and Anuj Kumar, founder of Legal Desire, who evaluated the pitches based on originality, feasibility, legal relevance, and impact. “We are truly proud of what this event has become,” said Surbhi Agrawal Founder of LegalWiki “It’s the first time I’ve planned something this ambitious, and the support from the community, judges, and participants has been deeply humbling. We were amazed by the creativity and passion on display.” Winners of the LegalWiki Legal Startup Competition: Winner: Team 11 – Lavanya Dhamija, student of Vivekananda Institute of Professional Studies 1st Runner-up: Team 26 – Adrika Singh & Rithik Chaudhary students of Campus Law Centre 2nd Runner-up: Team 18 – Soorya Narayanan, Arundhathi. S & Abhimanyu Sharma students of VIT School of Law, Sathyabama Institute of Technology, IIM Bangalore.  Lavanya Dhamija also bagged special accolades for Best Solo Pitch and Most Innovative Idea, scoring the highest among all participants. The event was generously sponsored by MikeLegal, a leading legal tech firm, with Tushar Bhargava extending support for all prize money. “It’s encouraging to see the legal community embrace innovation,” said a spokesperson from MikeLegal. “We’re proud to support a platform that gives young minds the space to challenge convention and build something impactful.” LegalWiki plans to make this competition an annual flagship event, with the goal of fostering a startup culture within the legal ecosystem and bridging the gap between law and technology. A special thanks to our Knowledge Partner – Bettering Results, a platform offering practical legal education and skill-based courses for law students across India. They generously provided a free course to the winning team, along with exclusive discounts for the runner-ups and all participants. Their support and collaboration played a key role in making this initiative a success.