The funding is the latest sign of fierce competition among investors to gain exposure to AI startups. AI deals accounted for more than 35% of the $366 billion worth of venture capital deals last year, according to research firm PitchBook.
Besides Thrive and Andreessen Horowitz, the round included another major venture capital firm, Benchmark.
A wave of AI investments has pushed up valuations of startups, with OpenAI worth more than $150 billion and Databricks worth $62 billion. That has generated concern about whether the fervor is inflating a speculative bubble.
In the case of Anysphere, its new valuation is up sixfold from what it fetched in its last fundraising round — in May. Even so, “we turned down higher offers,” said Michael Truell, the company’s cofounder and chief executive officer (CEO).
Discover the stories of your interest
The interest stems from Anysphere’s Cursor product. The software, which operates off proprietary models and large language models from OpenAI and Anthropic, helps autocomplete code for programmers. On Monday, the company unveiled a new version of a feature that can predict a user’s next line of code — with Truell saying that in some cases it can fill in the next 10 minutes’ worth of programming.
Its something that many tech moguls have high hopes for: Mark Zuckerberg, CEO of Meta, said recently on “The Joe Rogan Experience” that his company will begin automating some code-writing.
Anysphere has also quietly rolled out so-called agentic features for Cursor that can independently complete some tasks for users. “Source code is starting to blend into the background,” Truell said.
Other companies, including Codeium, Poolside and Sourcegraph, offer competing products, and the Copilot feature of Microsoft’s GitHub also focuses on automating coding. In November, Anysphere bought another competitor, Supermaven.
Mile Grimshaw, a partner at Thrive who helped lead the investment, said in an interview that developers from all of his firm’s portfolio companies use Cursor, up from a handful a year ago.
That, Grimshaw said, was part of what made him receptive to Truell’s argument in the fall that Anysphere should raise money again, given the company’s growth. Truell added that he had wanted to show the public how stable Anysphere’s business was and that the new money was not specifically earmarked for any particular purpose.
“We’ve never seen a company achieve such broad and rapid adoption,” Martin Casado, a partner at Andreessen Horowitz who sits on Anysphere’s board, said in a statement.
For some skeptics, the investor AI fervor — especially how quickly it has pushed up funding rounds — has increased the possibility of companies being overvalued, as in previous technology booms.
But Truell said that Anysphere had sought to keep a lid on costs, including spending on computing resources. He also argued that his company’s valuation was within historical norms. (It’s about 25 times Anysphere’s $100 million in annual recurring revenue, in line with other AI startups.)
While acknowledging concerns about valuations, Grimshaw argued that some of these companies were building transformational products, likening them to Google, Instagram and Amazon.
“I’m sure there will be some companies that didn’t live up to their hopes and dreams,” he said. But the advances and adoption of Cursor suggested that Anysphere didn’t belong in that category. “The opportunity is so big,” Grimshaw added.
